So, here's the short story:
In January 2006 I was diagnosed (DX'd) with indolent follicular non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, or
fNHL.
- Indolent means it moves slowly, and indeed, for two years it barely moved at all.
- Follicular means that under a microscope it looks kind of like hair follicles
- Non-Hodgkin (note, not Hodgkin's) is one of two major classifications of lymphoma. There are 60+ types.
- Lymphoma is a blood cancer like leukemia or multiple myeloma. It specifically affects the white or "lymph" blood cells that combat infection. More specifically, it is a cancer of the B cells, one of three major elements of the immune system.
Lymphoma is when one individual B cell gets cancerous and starts reproducing (cloning) itself. All the cancerous B cells are therefore "identical twins". It becomes harmful as the lymph nodes increase in size and crowd out or otherwise impair body functions. (Lymph nodes are places where B cells go to mature and hang out -- sort of like college. They are born in the bone marrow.) So... it's a systemic (not local) disease almost immediately, since lymph goes everywhere blood does.
This fall, one particular lymph node started growing like topsy to where it is now about the volume of a tennis ball. Additionally, since I am CT-scanned every 4-6 months, the doctors could tell that other lymph nodes were also growing and my spleen (where B cells go to get recycled) was enlarged.
Dr. Dubois (dew-bwah), my hematologist-oncologist, decided in January that I must begin treatment. If you
saw this one node/tumor you would agree. We were about to begin doing the standard biopsy of this big tumor preparatory to beginning standard treatment. However, at my prompting, it turns out that his principal colleague at Dana-Farber has been participating in clinical trials of a gee-whiz new kind of drug called an
idiotype cancer vaccine. We had to decide in a hurry if we wanted to get on board, because we really want to start whacking this thing. We decided that we did, in part because the first year of treatment is identical to the "standard of care" treatment I was about to begin anyway! But, it means that Dana Farber has to do somewhat more extensive intitial preparation than Emerson (the local hospital in Concord) would do.
So, today I got a nice chunk taken out of mr. tennis ball, and got CT-scanned once again. The biopsy tissue goes to California, where they attempt to make a vaccine specifically for me from it. There is about a 5%-10% chance they can't.
I also need a bone-marrow biopsy before treatment can begin, and therein lies todays' frustration: I heard that these hurt like hell, and so get general anesthesia, not just local. So I asked Dana Farber, they said they use morphine and atavan (good stuff) but wouldn't knock me out. They only do that for pediatric cases. So I said, OK, fine. They also said, let's wait until we know the vaccine can be made, should be 5-7 business days. Sounded good to me.
Today, I find out that no, it could be weeks before we learn about the vaccine, so if I want treatment to begin, I need to get the bone marrow biopsy done regardless. Dana-Farber tells me I can get it done locally (at Emerson). Turns out they didn't "get" that I'm okay with morphine/atavan and decided I don't need to be knocked out, and were referring me to Emerson because they just don't do that. So I correct them on that and schedule one at Emerson, only to find out that Emerson does NOT use morphine and atavan, just a local. Ouch. Unless it's done in the hospital, not the office. Which will be a longer delay, I'm sure. So I'm caught between wanting to get started and wanting to avoid a pain that has been described as "someone hitting your hip bone with a chisel and a mallet." Am I being a sissy? I don't think so, but I am causing problems. But I wouldn't be causing them if people had given me all the information at once!